H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Boris Becker H2H: 0-2

Boris Becker holds a 2–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Boris Becker leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Boris Becker won the 1994 Tokyo Outdoor fourth round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Boris Becker
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 8, 1994* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Hard Boris Becker #14 6-4 7-5 Kenneth Carlsen #108 Match data
Feb 19, 1993* Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Boris Becker #4 6-4 7-6(6) Kenneth Carlsen #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Boris Becker #257 #1 4,297 2,266 670 219 75.4% 6 9 4 0 30 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Boris Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1984 11–11 50.0% #66 1,651 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 50–18 73.5% #6 2,066 1 3
18 — — — — — — — 1986 65–13 83.3% #2 2,229 2 9
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1987 50–15 76.9% #5 2,040 2 12
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1988 50–9 84.7% #4 2,180 2 19
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1989 54–8 87.1% #2 2,232 4 24
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1990 69–14 83.1% #2 2,206 4 29
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1991 46–13 78.0% #3 2,112 5 31
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1992 48–15 76.2% #5 2,145 5 36
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1993 42–22 65.6% #11 1,885 5 38
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1994 50–17 74.6% #3 2,052 5 42
27 — — — — — — — 1995 51–18 73.9% #4 2,043 5 44
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 1996 42–14 75.0% #6 2,083 6 49
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 1997 17–13 56.7% #62 1,914 6 49
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 1998 15–11 57.7% #69 1,874 6 49
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 1999 10–7 58.8% #131 1,863 6 49
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —