H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Byron Black H2H: 4-1

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 4–1 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 1998 Hong Kong final 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Byron Black
ZIM Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 1998* Hong Kong ATP 250 F Hard Kenneth Carlsen #76 6-2 6-0 Byron Black #80 Match data
Jan 2, 1997* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Byron Black #44 6-4 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #73 Match data
Aug 26, 1993* Schenectady ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #60 6-3 6-4 Byron Black #83 Match data
Jul 28, 1993* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #57 6-4 6-4 Byron Black #105 Match data
Oct 23, 1992* Taipei ATP 250 R16 Carpet Kenneth Carlsen #75 6-4 6-2 Byron Black #148 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Byron Black #876 #22 1,283 1,870 239 229 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Byron Black
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1991 2–3 40.0% #123 1,521 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1992 10–18 35.7% #142 1,544 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1993 19–20 48.7% #84 1,662 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1994 22–26 45.8% #66 1,732 0 0
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1995 28–24 53.8% #40 1,832 0 0
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1996 34–26 56.7% #44 1,747 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1997 27–24 52.9% #76 1,724 0 1
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 1998 37–25 59.7% #28 1,738 0 1
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 1999 24–23 51.1% #65 1,690 0 2
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2000 27–24 52.9% #35 1,697 0 2
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2001 8–13 38.1% #196 1,647 0 2
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2002 1–3 25.0% #317 1,634 0 2
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —