H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 0-3

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1997 Queen's Club second round 7-5 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 1997* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass Cedric Pioline #46 7-5 4-6 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #92 Match data
Mar 17, 1996* Copenhagen ATP 250 F Carpet Cedric Pioline #32 6-2 7-6(7) Kenneth Carlsen #73 Match data
Jun 27, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Cedric Pioline #23 6-4 6-4 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —