H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 0-4

Fabrice Santoro holds a 4–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2005 New Haven second round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 24, 2005* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #77 6-3 6-0 Kenneth Carlsen #54 Match data
Aug 16, 2001* Washington ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #21 6-2 7-5 Kenneth Carlsen #276 Match data
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Fabrice Santoro #127 7-6(3) 6-3 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #111 Match data
Aug 16, 1993 Indianapolis ATP 250 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #39 6-2 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6