H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 0-1
Fernando Vicente holds a 1–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 2002 Australian Open first round 2-6 2-6 6-4 6-4 10-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Fernando Vicente | 2-6 2-6 6-4 6-4 10-8 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |