H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Gilles Muller H2H: 2-1

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–1 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2006 Indianapolis fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 17, 2006 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Gilles Muller #76 6-1 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #123 Match data
Mar 7, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #110 6-3 4-6 6-3 Gilles Muller #69 Match data
Oct 2, 2004* Shanghai ATP 250 QF Hard Kenneth Carlsen #103 7-6(5) 6-1 Gilles Muller #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2