H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 1-5

Goran Ivanisevic holds a 5–1 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 4–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 1999 Miami Masters second round 6-2 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Goran Ivanisevic
CRO Age 54 Left-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 17, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #106 6-2 3-6 6-4 Goran Ivanisevic #14 Match data
Oct 10, 1998* Shanghai ATP 250 QF Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #12 6-3 7-6(2) Kenneth Carlsen #78 Match data
Feb 26, 1998* London ATP 250 R32 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #16 6-1 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #88 Match data
Oct 13, 1995* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #7 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #66 Match data
Aug 3, 1995* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Hard Goran Ivanisevic #7 6-2 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #89 Match data
Feb 25, 1994* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #6 6-1 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Goran Ivanisevic #395 #2 3,572 2,124 561 316 64.0% 1 2 1 0 18 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Goran Ivanisevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #371 1,488 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 29–23 55.8% #40 1,691 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 46–22 67.6% #9 1,921 0 1
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1991 35–21 62.5% #16 1,922 0 2
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1992 57–18 76.0% #4 2,090 0 6
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1993 50–21 70.4% #7 2,031 0 9
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1994 62–26 70.5% #5 1,976 0 11
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1995 41–22 65.1% #10 1,911 0 12
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1996 76–24 76.0% #4 2,001 0 17
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1997 51–20 71.8% #15 1,866 0 20
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1998 44–28 61.1% #12 1,873 0 21
27 — — — — — — — 1999 22–26 45.8% #62 1,713 0 21
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2000 11–21 34.4% #129 1,596 0 21
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2001 28–21 57.1% #12 1,814 1 22
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2002 4–7 36.4% #243 1,698 1 22
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2003 0–3 0.0% #657 1,646 1 22
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2004 4–10 28.6% #266 1,632 1 22
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —