H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 0-3

Guillermo Canas holds a 3–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2005 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Guillermo Canas #14 6-4 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #56 Match data
Jun 21, 2002* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Guillermo Canas #17 6-4 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #83 Match data
Jun 29, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Guillermo Canas #49 7-5 4-6 6-7(1) 7-6(4) 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #1013 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 2,008 244 188 56.5% 0 1 0 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,462 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,461 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,481 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,840 0 1
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,857 0 3
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,805 0 3
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,898 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,889 0 6
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,821 0 7
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2008 21–19 52.5% #79 1,690 0 7
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,628 0 7
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —