H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-1
Kenneth Carlsen and Hyung-Taik Lee are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2003 Tokyo fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2003* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 6-4 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2001* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 6-1 7-5 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kenneth Carlsen | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |