H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Jan Hernych H2H: 2-0
Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Hernych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2006 Zagreb third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2006* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kenneth Carlsen | 6-2 6-4 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2004* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-5 6-1 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Jan Hernych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |