H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 2-2
Kenneth Carlsen and Jan Siemerink are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1996 Hong Kong fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1996* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-4 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1995* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 7-6(3) | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1995* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 6-4 2-6 7-6(4) | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1993* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kenneth Carlsen | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Jan Siemerink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |