H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Jim Courier H2H: 0-4
Jim Courier holds a 4–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1999 Queen's Club second round 6-2 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1999* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Jim Courier | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jim Courier | 6-3 6-4 6-0 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1994* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |