H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-1

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 1995 US Open first round 6-7(6) 7-6(1) 6-2 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #73 6-7(6) 7-6(1) 6-2 3-6 6-2 Jim Grabb #136 Match data
Apr 20, 1995* Hong Kong ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #84 6-4 7-5 Jim Grabb #100 Match data
Oct 14, 1992* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R64 Carpet Jim Grabb #78 5-7 7-6(1) 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #75 Match data
Oct 3, 1992* Brisbane ATP 250 QF Hard Kenneth Carlsen #101 3-6 6-1 6-4 Jim Grabb #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —