H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-0
Kenneth Carlsen holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2002 Tokyo fourth round 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2002* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |