H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 0-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2004 Washington third round 6-1 6-2.

DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 3
3 main draw meetings
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 2004* Washington ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #8 6-1 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #94 Match data
Aug 2, 2003* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #5 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #76 Match data
Oct 15, 1999* Singapore ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #31 6-1 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30