H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-0
Kenneth Carlsen holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2005 Indianapolis third round 7-5 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2005 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Marcos Baghdatis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |