H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-2

Mark Woodforde holds a 2–1 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1998 Singapore quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 1998* Singapore ATP 250 QF Carpet Mark Woodforde #91 4-6 6-2 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #75 Match data
Oct 2, 1997* Beijing ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #90 6-4 7-6(3) Mark Woodforde #31 Match data
Jun 23, 1995* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Mark Woodforde #33 6-4 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4