H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Mats Wilander H2H: 0-1
Mats Wilander holds a 1–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1995 New Haven fourth round 6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1995* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mats Wilander | 6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(2) | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |