H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 0-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 1–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2004 Moscow quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 16, 2004* Moscow ATP 250 QF Carpet Mikhail Youzhny #33 6-2 7-6(5) Kenneth Carlsen #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10