H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-0

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2006 Las Vegas fourth round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 3, 2006* Las Vegas ATP 250 R16 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #125 (w/o) Nicolas Kiefer #12 Match data
Sep 12, 2002* Tashkent ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #96 5-2 (ret.) Nicolas Kiefer #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —