H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 1-2

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 2–1 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on grass, while Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2005 Tokyo third round 7-6(1) 7-6(9).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 2005* Tokyo ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #64 7-6(1) 7-6(9) Nicolas Lapentti #82 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nicolas Lapentti #47 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #83 Match data
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nicolas Lapentti #86 7-6(3) 3-6 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —