H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 0-1
Nikolay Davydenko holds a 1–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nikolay Davydenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2006 Beijing third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2006* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-3 6-4 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Nikolay Davydenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |