H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-1

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2001 Queen's Club second round 2-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 13, 2001* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass Sargis Sargsian #123 2-6 6-3 7-5 Kenneth Carlsen #632 Match data
Aug 14, 1997* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #96 6-4 6-7(2) 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #76 Match data
Jul 25, 1997* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #100 6-4 3-6 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —