H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0
Kenneth Carlsen holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2005 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2006 | US Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 6-4 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2005* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kenneth Carlsen | 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-6(6) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kenneth Carlsen | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |