H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Taylor Dent H2H: 2-0

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–0 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2002 San Jose round of 32 7-6(6) 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Taylor Dent
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kenneth Carlsen #142 7-6(6) 7-6(2) Taylor Dent #100 Match data Feb 28, 2002* R32 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Kenneth Carlsen #498 7-6(2) 6-3 Taylor Dent #127 Match data Jul 13, 2001* R16 Newport ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 241 275 46.7% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Taylor Dent #979 #21 1,345 1,910 152 140 52.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Taylor Dent
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1998 1–3 25.0% #410 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #276 1,464 0 0
19 1992 10–8 55.6% #69 1,582 0 0 2000 3–7 30.0% #181 1,529 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,574 0 0 2001 10–13 43.5% #124 1,628 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 2002 20–17 54.1% #57 1,688 0 1
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,692 0 0 2003 28–12 70.0% #33 1,889 0 4
23 1996 19–23 45.2% #73 1,635 0 0 2004 32–25 56.1% #32 1,759 0 4
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,655 0 0 2005 33–21 61.1% #29 1,786 0 4
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,622 0 1 2006 1–4 20.0% #574 1,715 0 4
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% #865 1,673 0 4
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,678 0 1 2009 12–15 44.4% #76 1,731 0 4
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2010 12–19 38.7% #118 1,777 0 4
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,594 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,573 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,597 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,481 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Taylor Dent
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2001 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2002 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
22 1995 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2003 18 5 23 78.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 1996 11 13 24 45.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2004 25 16 41 61.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2005 24 15 39 61.5% — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2006 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 12 13 25 48.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2001 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2002 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 9 12 21 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 13 14 27 48.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154 156 310 49.7% 10 34 44 22.7% 31 37 68 45.6% 46 48 94 48.9% — 113 101 214 52.8% 4 12 16 25.0% 29 23 52 55.8% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/516 of Kenneth Carlsen's and 277/292 of Taylor Dent's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Taylor Dent
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 4/4 5.8 5.5 51.6% 71.1% 47.8% 52.0% 15.8% 60.1% 32.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/2 4.5 4.0 52.4% 58.4% 52.8% 38.6% 50.0% 55.6% 16.3%
19 1992 13/18 8.4 1.8 58.2% 77.8% 54.9% 67.5% 38.7% 68.2% 33.3% 2000 9/10 7.7 5.7 55.0% 73.1% 47.0% 59.7% 32.1% 61.8% 32.4%
20 1993 41/44 6.8 2.9 55.0% 75.7% 49.6% 51.7% 33.0% 64.2% 34.6% 2001 22/23 7.2 5.5 53.3% 77.2% 48.9% 52.3% 35.8% 63.6% 37.4%
21 1994 36/41 7.2 2.8 57.5% 75.3% 52.1% 65.5% 43.1% 65.2% 34.3% 2002 31/37 7.0 4.4 59.7% 72.5% 53.0% 54.4% 47.5% 64.5% 38.6%
22 1995 42/47 8.8 3.9 57.6% 76.1% 50.6% 65.4% 46.2% 65.2% 34.3% 2003 39/40 8.5 6.3 55.1% 78.7% 52.1% 64.4% 46.6% 66.7% 40.0%
23 1996 32/42 7.9 4.1 58.6% 75.2% 50.8% 66.3% 30.0% 64.9% 34.9% 2004 51/57 6.4 5.7 59.9% 73.2% 49.5% 60.1% 47.7% 63.7% 37.7%
24 1997 39/50 9.0 3.7 56.3% 75.3% 50.4% 65.7% 42.1% 64.4% 35.5% 2005 54/54 8.1 6.6 54.3% 78.7% 49.9% 60.4% 40.5% 65.7% 38.2%
25 1998 32/45 9.4 4.5 54.5% 76.8% 48.7% 66.6% 42.3% 64.1% 34.5% 2006 5/5 7.8 5.0 59.6% 76.5% 44.0% 50.7% 37.9% 63.6% 32.9%
26 1999 33/38 5.9 3.5 59.1% 74.4% 50.3% 58.0% 41.7% 64.6% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 6.0 7.5 60.2% 69.7% 44.4% 39.8% 51.1% 59.6% 35.2%
28 2001 13/16 8.9 6.2 55.5% 73.0% 48.1% 62.6% 38.0% 61.9% 37.2% 2009 27/27 7.9 5.9 58.3% 77.2% 46.3% 56.8% 43.8% 64.1% 34.7%
29 2002 25/30 9.7 2.8 59.8% 75.3% 53.2% 75.9% 31.5% 66.6% 34.2% 2010 31/31 7.8 5.9 56.0% 74.5% 46.9% 59.1% 42.8% 62.3% 34.6%
30 2003 34/35 8.3 2.9 58.2% 73.2% 50.2% 51.3% 34.2% 63.3% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 34/34 7.5 3.1 60.6% 73.0% 49.3% 48.2% 38.9% 63.6% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 41/42 6.1 2.7 60.3% 71.4% 47.6% 63.1% 31.3% 61.7% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 32/33 7.1 2.1 61.4% 72.6% 50.2% 58.8% 39.9% 64.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1/1 13.0 1.0 76.3% 80.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 72.9% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 448/516 7.8 3.3 58.1% 74.6% 50.2% 61.1% 38.0% 64.3% 34.4% — 277/292 7.5 5.8 56.6% 75.7% 49.5% 58.5% 43.1% 64.3% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Taylor Dent
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1493 99.7 -1.26 -1.61 0.814 45.7% +33 — — 12.5% -2.75 0–1 1–1 — +0.32
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1465 96.9 -3.78 -2.62 0.368 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — +0.21
19 1992 1583 123.7 +3.17 -2.70 1.049 50.9% +31 — — 52.4% +0.38 3–1 (75%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.52 2000 1529 121.3 +0.19 -0.70 0.847 47.1% -45 — — 30.0% -0.75 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.36
20 1993 1575 137.7 +2.19 -2.94 0.967 49.0% +16 -19 +24 41.8% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.66 2001 1629 135.5 +1.76 +1.11 1.026 50.3% -54 — +38 47.4% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.88
21 1994 1626 135.7 +2.62 -2.80 0.985 49.7% -7 -82 +48 48.0% +0.05 6–3 (67%) 6–12 (33%) — +0.62 2002 1689 132.9 +1.18 +0.85 1.087 51.5% -39 — +71 56.8% +0.38 3–7 (30%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.03
22 1995 1692 137.1 +2.15 -2.47 0.985 50.1% +25 -113 -61 50.0% +0.01 8–7 (53%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.47 2003 1889 141.1 +3.77 +2.59 1.202 53.1% +34 -446 -112 68.5% +0.98 4–3 (57%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.53
23 1996 1635 128.4 +2.08 -2.12 0.993 49.7% +14 -66 -25 47.7% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.61 2004 1759 136.0 +0.62 +1.01 1.040 50.8% +38 -302 +19 53.7% +0.19 9–7 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.76
24 1997 1656 129.2 +2.54 -2.10 0.998 50.1% +36 -138 -67 50.0% -0.02 9–12 (43%) 16–15 (52%) — +1.85 2005 1786 148.2 +2.55 +1.76 1.112 51.9% +20 — +62 61.1% +0.69 7–6 (54%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.10
25 1998 1622 133.7 +1.62 -2.28 0.960 49.4% +55 — -75 49.6% +0.09 9–11 (45%) 8–11 (42%) — +2.63 2006 1715 112.2 +0.47 -2.19 0.903 47.7% 0 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.05
26 1999 1658 136.2 +1.26 +0.13 1.048 50.7% +21 -163 -30 51.6% +0.05 5–7 (42%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1673 99.9 -1.58 -0.41 0.872 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.27
28 2001 1679 118.7 +0.30 -0.45 0.975 49.8% -2 — -48 60.5% +0.53 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.81 2009 1731 134.4 -0.29 -1.60 0.968 49.6% +28 — +79 45.8% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.07
29 2002 1743 133.7 +3.42 -2.03 1.023 50.3% 0 — -100 51.4% +0.04 6–5 (55%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.90 2010 1777 141.2 -0.60 -0.78 0.919 48.7% +7 -290 +11 42.3% -0.45 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.86
30 2003 1594 113.9 +0.36 -2.67 0.941 48.7% +43 -159 -14 41.9% -0.54 7–9 (44%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1650 124.0 +0.26 -2.15 0.919 48.5% +14 -237 -5 40.7% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 11–7 (61%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1573 117.9 -1.06 -3.54 0.828 46.7% +32 -220 +37 38.1% -1.00 8–4 (67%) 15–12 (56%) — +1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1598 132.6 +0.39 -1.27 0.954 49.1% +53 — — 41.8% -0.23 8–4 (67%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1481 95.8 -0.84 -0.44 0.782 45.6% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1754 134.8 +1.46 -2.20 0.965 49.4% +26 -127 -28 46.8% -0.17 88–83 (51%) 132–124 (52%) 104.2 +2.42 — 1911 143.3 +1.28 +0.73 1.037 50.7% +9 -344 +24 52.8% +0.16 34–46 (43%) 71–61 (54%) 97.1 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.