H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Thomas Muster H2H: 0-1
Thomas Muster holds a 1–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1994 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Thomas Muster | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Thomas Muster | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 |