H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Todd Martin H2H: 0-2

Todd Martin holds a 2–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1999 Memphis fourth round 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 1999* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Todd Martin #12 7-6(3) 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #93 Match data
May 29, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Todd Martin #18 6-1 6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —