H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 1-3
Todd Woodbridge holds a 3–1 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1999 Shanghai third round 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1999* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| May 28, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Todd Woodbridge | 7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Todd Woodbridge | 2-6 6-0 6-1 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1993* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-5 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |