H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 5-1

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 5–1 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Wayne Arthurs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2006 Newport third round 7-6(5) 7-6(6).

DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 13, 2006* Newport ATP 250 R32 Grass Wayne Arthurs #198 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Kenneth Carlsen #120 Match data
Feb 18, 2005* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #87 6-4 7-6(5) Wayne Arthurs #109 Match data
Oct 1, 2004* Shanghai ATP 250 R16 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #103 1-6 6-3 7-6(4) Wayne Arthurs #100 Match data
Jul 15, 2004* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #88 7-6(3) 6-3 Wayne Arthurs #103 Match data
Feb 14, 2002* Copenhagen ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #147 6-4 6-4 Wayne Arthurs #89 Match data
Apr 15, 1999* Tokyo ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #127 6-4 6-2 Wayne Arthurs #185 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 122 152 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Wayne Arthurs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1
27 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,638 0 0
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,700 0 0
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2004 12–19 38.7% #101 1,567 0 0
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,624 0 1
35 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,626 0 1
36 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,668 0 1