H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Wesley Moodie H2H: 1-1

Kenneth Carlsen and Wesley Moodie are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Wesley Moodie won the 2006 Washington Open round of 16 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Wesley Moodie
RSA Age 47 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wesley Moodie #86 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(6) Kenneth Carlsen #115 Match data Aug 4, 2006* R16 Washington Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Kenneth Carlsen #72 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 Wesley Moodie #82 Match data Sep 12, 2003* R16 Costa Do Sauipe ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 241 275 46.7% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Wesley Moodie #1,149 #57 664 1,747 47 65 42.0% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Wesley Moodie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 10–8 55.6% #69 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,574 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1996 19–23 45.2% #73 1,635 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #246 1,476 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,655 0 0 2003 7–9 43.8% #82 1,584 0 0
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,622 0 1 2004 6–16 27.3% #137 1,513 0 0
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,658 0 1 2005 16–11 59.3% #63 1,714 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2006 11–19 36.7% #122 1,667 0 1
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,678 0 1 2007 7–9 43.8% #162 1,643 0 1
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,594 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,573 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,597 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,481 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Wesley Moodie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 10 12 22 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 11 13 24 45.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2003 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1999 12 13 25 48.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2001 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2002 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 9 12 21 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 13 14 27 48.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154 156 310 49.7% 10 34 44 22.7% 31 37 68 45.6% 46 48 94 48.9% — 34 45 79 43.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 12 21 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/516 of Kenneth Carlsen's and 111/111 of Wesley Moodie's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Wesley Moodie
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 13/18 8.4 1.8 58.2% 77.8% 54.9% 67.5% 38.7% 68.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 41/44 6.8 2.9 55.0% 75.7% 49.6% 51.7% 33.0% 64.2% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 36/41 7.2 2.8 57.5% 75.3% 52.1% 65.5% 43.1% 65.2% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 42/47 8.8 3.9 57.6% 76.1% 50.6% 65.4% 46.2% 65.2% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 32/42 7.9 4.1 58.6% 75.2% 50.8% 66.3% 30.0% 64.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 39/50 9.0 3.7 56.3% 75.3% 50.4% 65.7% 42.1% 64.4% 35.5% 2003 16/16 12.4 3.7 68.7% 73.1% 53.2% 58.0% 36.8% 66.8% 30.5%
25 1998 32/45 9.4 4.5 54.5% 76.8% 48.7% 66.6% 42.3% 64.1% 34.5% 2004 22/22 12.1 3.0 68.4% 75.1% 51.8% 57.9% 29.5% 67.4% 30.1%
26 1999 33/38 5.9 3.5 59.1% 74.4% 50.3% 58.0% 41.7% 64.6% 37.1% 2005 27/27 10.3 2.5 70.3% 73.7% 54.3% 62.3% 41.8% 67.8% 34.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 30/30 10.4 3.2 68.5% 73.4% 49.8% 57.3% 28.8% 65.8% 28.7%
28 2001 13/16 8.9 6.2 55.5% 73.0% 48.1% 62.6% 38.0% 61.9% 37.2% 2007 16/16 9.1 3.1 67.7% 72.1% 50.5% 66.3% 51.0% 65.1% 33.4%
29 2002 25/30 9.7 2.8 59.8% 75.3% 53.2% 75.9% 31.5% 66.6% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 34/35 8.3 2.9 58.2% 73.2% 50.2% 51.3% 34.2% 63.3% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 34/34 7.5 3.1 60.6% 73.0% 49.3% 48.2% 38.9% 63.6% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 41/42 6.1 2.7 60.3% 71.4% 47.6% 63.1% 31.3% 61.7% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 32/33 7.1 2.1 61.4% 72.6% 50.2% 58.8% 39.9% 64.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1/1 13.0 1.0 76.3% 80.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 72.9% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 448/516 7.8 3.3 58.1% 74.6% 50.2% 61.1% 38.0% 64.3% 34.4% — 111/112 10.8 3.1 68.8% 73.6% 51.9% 60.0% 36.4% 66.6% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Wesley Moodie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1583 123.7 +3.17 -2.70 1.049 50.9% +31 — — 52.4% +0.38 3–1 (75%) 2–5 (29%) 101.6 +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1575 137.7 +2.19 -2.94 0.967 49.0% +16 -19 +24 41.8% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.8 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1626 135.7 +2.62 -2.80 0.985 49.7% -7 -82 +48 48.0% +0.05 6–3 (67%) 6–12 (33%) 102.2 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1692 137.1 +2.15 -2.47 0.985 50.1% +25 -113 -61 50.0% +0.01 8–7 (53%) 13–12 (52%) 102.4 -0.47 2001 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 1635 128.4 +2.08 -2.12 0.993 49.7% +14 -66 -25 47.7% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 11–9 (55%) 97.2 +1.61 2002 1476 101.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.08
24 1997 1656 129.2 +2.54 -2.10 0.998 50.1% +36 -138 -67 50.0% -0.02 9–12 (43%) 16–15 (52%) 97.9 +1.85 2003 1585 113.8 +2.05 -3.39 0.919 48.8% -28 — +66 45.7% -0.37 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) 102.5 +0.43
25 1998 1622 133.7 +1.62 -2.28 0.960 49.4% +55 — -75 49.6% +0.09 9–11 (45%) 8–11 (42%) 96.6 +2.63 2004 1513 117.0 +2.48 -4.03 0.923 48.5% +1 — +53 37.9% -0.76 2–8 (20%) 11–12 (48%) 96.7 -0.05
26 1999 1658 136.2 +1.26 +0.13 1.048 50.7% +21 -163 -30 51.6% +0.05 5–7 (42%) 9–6 (60%) 103.0 +1.32 2005 1714 133.1 +3.49 -1.65 1.074 51.1% -8 — -61 55.0% +0.18 4–2 (67%) 9–7 (56%) 106.0 +0.89
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1668 130.0 +2.32 -5.69 0.839 47.2% +44 — -68 36.7% -0.77 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 97.8 0.00
28 2001 1679 118.7 +0.30 -0.45 0.975 49.8% -2 — -48 60.5% +0.53 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 103.2 +0.81 2007 1644 120.3 +1.43 -2.89 0.959 49.4% +20 — +31 48.5% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 94.9 +0.35
29 2002 1743 133.7 +3.42 -2.03 1.023 50.3% 0 — -100 51.4% +0.04 6–5 (55%) 14–9 (61%) 105.0 -0.90 2008 1567 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1594 113.9 +0.36 -2.67 0.941 48.7% +43 -159 -14 41.9% -0.54 7–9 (44%) 11–6 (65%) 99.4 +2.57 2009 1548 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1650 124.0 +0.26 -2.15 0.919 48.5% +14 -237 -5 40.7% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 11–7 (61%) 108.9 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1573 117.9 -1.06 -3.54 0.828 46.7% +32 -220 +37 38.1% -1.00 8–4 (67%) 15–12 (56%) 103.6 +1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1598 132.6 +0.39 -1.27 0.954 49.1% +53 — — 41.8% -0.23 8–4 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 104.1 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1481 95.8 -0.84 -0.44 0.782 45.6% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1754 134.8 +1.46 -2.20 0.965 49.4% +26 -127 -28 46.8% -0.17 88–83 (51%) 132–124 (52%) 104.2 +2.42 — 1747 125.7 +2.47 -3.64 0.940 48.9% +9 — +9 43.5% -0.40 18–20 (47%) 36–43 (46%) 98.9 +1.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.