H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Yevgeny Kafelnikov H2H: 0-6

Yevgeny Kafelnikov holds a 6–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 2003 US Open second round 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main draw meetings
Yevgeny Kafelnikov
RUS Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Yevgeny Kafelnikov #28 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #72 Match data
Sep 13, 2002* Tashkent ATP 250 R16 Hard Yevgeny Kafelnikov #8 3-6 6-4 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #96 Match data
Jun 15, 2002* Halle ATP 250 SF Grass Yevgeny Kafelnikov #6 4-6 6-3 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #99 Match data
Feb 9, 1995* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Carpet Yevgeny Kafelnikov #10 7-5 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #86 Match data
Jan 20, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Yevgeny Kafelnikov #12 4-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #94 Match data
Nov 11, 1993* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Yevgeny Kafelnikov #105 4-6 6-3 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Yevgeny Kafelnikov #636 #1 3,917 2,071 568 281 66.9% 2 0 0 0 23 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Yevgeny Kafelnikov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #275 1,477 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1993 10–10 50.0% #102 1,588 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1994 60–27 69.0% #11 1,888 0 3
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1995 69–27 71.9% #6 1,875 0 7
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1996 73–25 74.5% #3 1,972 1 11
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1997 54–26 67.5% #5 1,955 1 14
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #11 1,950 1 17
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1999 59–29 67.0% #2 1,922 2 20
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2000 58–31 65.2% #5 1,859 2 21
27 — — — — — — — 2001 64–26 71.1% #4 1,979 2 23
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2002 36–23 61.0% #27 1,809 2 25
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2003 29–24 54.7% #41 1,708 2 25
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —