H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kevin Kim vs Arvind Parmar

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Kevin Kim vs Arvind Parmar.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kevin Kim
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Arvind Parmar
GBR Age 48 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kevin Kim #223 5-7 6-1 9-7 Arvind Parmar #178 Match data Jan 19, 2004 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kevin Kim #1,213 #63 866 1,642 44 97 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Arvind Parmar #1,507 #137 282 1,604 14 26 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kevin Kim Arvind Parmar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2000 2–5 28.6% #141 1,424 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #250 1,523 0 0
22 2001 1–3 25.0% #184 1,392 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #154 1,555 0 0
23 2002 2–3 40.0% #238 1,430 0 0 2001 2–3 40.0% #210 1,524 0 0
24 2003 0–1 0.0% #219 1,453 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #170 1,519 0 0
25 2004 2–3 40.0% #94 1,550 0 0 2003 2–5 28.6% #166 1,516 0 0
26 2005 19–25 43.2% #101 1,561 0 0 2004 1–6 14.3% #183 1,463 0 0
27 2006 7–18 28.0% #101 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2007 3–14 17.6% #178 1,483 0 0 2006 2–1 66.7% #331 1,462 0 0
29 2008 0–3 0.0% #117 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2009 7–16 30.4% #117 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2010 1–3 25.0% #245 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kevin Kim Arvind Parmar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
23 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2005 15 17 32 46.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 68 104 34.6% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 11 17 28 39.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 122/122 of Kevin Kim's and 36/40 of Arvind Parmar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kevin Kim Arvind Parmar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/3 1.0 3.5 54.0% 64.8% 56.3% 45.2% — 61.8% 14.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 9/10 8.9 3.0 58.3% 77.3% 51.8% 52.6% 53.0% 66.2% 30.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 4/5 11.3 3.0 64.8% 72.9% 54.3% 61.8% 32.4% 66.2% 30.4%
24 2003 1/1 7.0 1.0 66.2% 68.9% 52.2% 0.0% 20.0% 63.2% 37.1% 2002 4/5 8.8 4.5 58.2% 76.7% 40.8% 41.7% 52.3% 62.1% 30.8%
25 2004 5/5 3.6 1.4 61.4% 66.2% 47.8% 59.8% 47.0% 59.1% 37.1% 2003 7/7 4.3 2.1 65.2% 67.4% 49.2% 59.8% 16.4% 61.1% 32.3%
26 2005 44/44 6.5 3.0 60.0% 70.8% 46.9% 60.9% 41.2% 61.3% 35.8% 2004 7/7 6.6 2.9 61.2% 67.5% 47.9% 43.7% 38.4% 59.9% 32.6%
27 2006 25/25 3.3 3.6 57.7% 66.7% 48.8% 48.4% 41.2% 59.3% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 17/17 3.6 2.9 61.0% 68.4% 39.1% 41.4% 29.0% 57.0% 34.0% 2006 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.0% 78.5% 53.9% 77.8% 33.3% 67.4% 31.4%
29 2008 3/3 6.3 5.0 47.9% 69.6% 49.2% 71.6% 27.8% 59.6% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 23/23 4.7 4.6 54.2% 71.5% 41.1% 48.2% 39.7% 57.5% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 4/4 3.5 4.3 53.7% 72.6% 43.1% 61.9% 12.1% 59.0% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122/141 4.9 3.4 58.2% 69.6% 45.1% 53.0% 38.0% 59.4% 34.9% — 36/40 7.1 3.0 60.4% 72.3% 50.0% 53.8% 36.1% 63.4% 30.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kevin Kim Arvind Parmar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1486 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1469 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 1425 106.2 — — — — +31 — — 36.8% -1.00 1–3 (25%) — — +0.39 1999 1523 101.6 -4.10 +2.68 0.367 39.2% — — +74 33.3% -1.22 — 1–1 — -0.19
22 2001 1392 103.2 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 — — +0.28 2000 1556 119.6 +1.27 -2.23 0.899 48.3% -23 — +75 43.3% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.01
23 2002 1430 106.3 — — — — +23 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 2001 1524 100.8 +1.13 -0.45 0.899 49.0% — — +76 41.2% -0.65 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.27
24 2003 1453 101.1 -1.94 -2.05 1.009 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08 2002 1520 102.3 -1.20 -0.61 0.813 46.4% — — +66 30.0% -1.10 0–1 1–1 — -0.20
25 2004 1550 107.7 -1.03 +1.02 0.909 47.9% -39 — — 36.4% -1.18 — — — -0.18 2003 1517 104.0 -0.29 -2.15 0.830 46.7% +9 — +37 33.3% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.17
26 2005 1562 124.4 -1.57 -1.25 0.924 48.7% +17 -35 -52 44.2% -0.30 7–7 (50%) 8–14 (36%) — +1.98 2004 1464 111.0 -1.41 -0.24 0.813 46.0% +28 — +63 22.2% -1.28 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.02
27 2006 1546 126.0 -2.01 -0.63 0.882 47.5% -14 +9 — 34.9% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.13 2005 1483 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1484 113.2 -4.48 -1.97 0.789 45.2% +39 — — 23.8% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.68 2006 1463 104.2 -1.30 -2.76 0.964 49.9% +29 — — 57.1% 0.00 1–0 2–0 — +0.46
29 2008 1517 103.8 -0.92 +0.78 0.805 46.6% — — — 12.5% -1.38 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1599 124.8 -3.91 -1.54 0.767 45.5% +20 -104 -33 25.5% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2010 1581 108.5 -1.08 -1.69 0.826 46.6% +31 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2011 1553 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 1546 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 1535 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1642 118.6 -2.46 -1.16 0.859 47.2% +15 -38 -43 34.1% -0.93 14–21 (40%) 11–27 (29%) 90.4 +2.06 — 1605 111.8 -0.36 -1.22 0.830 47.0% +11 — +66 36.7% -0.85 7–9 (44%) 12–14 (46%) 101.8 +1.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.