H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kevin Kim vs Lars Burgsmuller H2H: 1-0
Kevin Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Lars Burgsmuller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kevin Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Kim won the 2004 Beijing third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 50
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kevin Kim | 6-2 6-2 | Lars Burgsmuller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lars Burgsmuller | #1,129 | #65 | 596 | 1,747 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kevin Kim | Lars Burgsmuller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #134 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #134 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #83 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #141 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |