H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Andrew Pattison H2H: 0-2 (incl. walkovers)

Kim Warwick vs Andrew Pattison: 0–1 excluding walkovers; 0–2 including 1 walkover. Across 2 main-draw results including walkovers, Andrew Pattison leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrew Pattison won the 1980 Forest Hills Wct round of 32 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H including walkovers
0 – 2
2 main-draw results
Andrew Pattison
USA Age 77 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrew Pattison 6-0 6-4 Kim Warwick #54 Match data May 8, 1980* R32 Forest Hills Wct ATP 250 Clay
Andrew Pattison (w/o) Kim Warwick Match data Jan 12, 1976* QF Columbus Wct ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Andrew Pattison — — — 1,979 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Andrew Pattison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Andrew Pattison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1968 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1972 6 6 12 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1973 10 7 17 58.8% 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1974 14 4 18 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 0 2 100.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1975 8 6 14 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1977 11 9 20 55.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1979 13 7 20 65.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 96 79 175 54.9% 63 60 123 51.2% 30 28 58 51.7% 67 70 137 48.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Andrew Pattison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 1968 1450 97.3 — — — — -2 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1969 1473 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.07
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1970 1495 118.6 — — — — +83 +19 -13 35.2% -0.83 0–3 (0%) — — -0.34
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.10 1971 1586 125.4 — — — — +32 — -50 49.0% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.46
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1972 1840 143.1 — — — — -75 -2 -227 62.3% +0.95 9–5 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 109.4 +0.22
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +0.01 1973 1772 131.9 — — — — -44 +3 -85 48.5% -0.10 8–7 (53%) 7–11 (39%) 99.9 -2.65
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1974 1923 152.3 — — — — -14 -59 — 66.0% +1.30 8–3 (73%) 4–1 (80%) 109.2 -1.00
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1975 1934 141.2 — — — — -77 -17 -175 54.2% +0.23 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 99.9 -1.91
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1976 1821 146.5 — — — — +15 — — 42.5% -0.37 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 103.6 -2.94
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 1977 1774 143.4 — — — — +32 +17 -27 51.1% +0.14 10–9 (53%) 14–6 (70%) 105.5 -2.22
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 1978 1708 135.0 — — — — +19 +74 — 47.2% +0.19 4–3 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 101.7 +1.01
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 1979 1778 133.4 — — — — +31 -65 -60 49.1% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 104.1 -0.12
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 1980 1732 146.9 — — — — +51 -26 +6 50.0% +0.07 4–3 (57%) 6–11 (35%) 97.6 -3.35
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 1981 1689 126.4 — — — — +45 -39 — 40.5% -0.60 4–2 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.5 +0.16
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 1982 1622 121.6 — — — — +11 — — 36.1% -1.17 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1603 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1980 145.1 — — — — +3 -7 -92 50.3% +0.11 78–59 (57%) 71–64 (53%) 108.6 -2.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.