H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs David Carter H2H: 0-1

David Carter holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Carter leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Carter won the 1979 Florence round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
David Carter
AUS Age 70 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Carter 6-4 6-2 Kim Warwick Match data May 17, 1979* R32 Florence ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
David Carter #606 #78 0 1,732 76 119 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick David Carter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,460 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1974 1–1 50.0% — 1,470 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1975 3–2 60.0% #373 1,511 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1976 1–1 50.0% #288 1,530 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1977 2–3 40.0% #269 1,530 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1978 12–19 38.7% #139 1,549 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1979 8–16 33.3% #118 1,597 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1980 15–23 39.5% #145 1,603 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1981 16–19 45.7% #95 1,699 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1982 14–23 37.8% #85 1,602 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1983 3–8 27.3% #190 1,581 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1984 0–1 0.0% #609 1,561 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick David Carter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1980 6 10 16 37.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1982 2 9 11 18.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 16 32 48 33.3% 38 52 90 42.2% 18 27 45 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick David Carter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1484 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.23
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1478 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1973 1460 92.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.14
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1974 1471 103.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 — — +0.11
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1975 1512 109.5 — — — — — — +38 50.0% +0.22 2–0 0–1 — +0.47
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1976 1531 105.7 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.29 — — — +0.16
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1977 1530 108.0 — — — — — — +17 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.40
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1978 1550 134.3 — — — — -3 +30 +30 43.4% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.41
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1979 1597 121.4 — — — — -30 -32 -21 36.9% -1.23 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.67
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1980 1604 128.6 — — — — -46 +10 — 41.8% -0.65 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.84
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1981 1699 132.3 — — — — -92 +7 -163 43.8% -0.45 10–6 (63%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.01
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1982 1602 125.8 — — — — -53 +61 -25 40.4% -0.52 5–4 (56%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.86
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1983 1581 115.4 — — — — -37 +46 — 32.0% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.32
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1984 1562 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.18
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1732 130.8 — — — — -45 +16 -22 40.8% -0.67 32–31 (51%) 25–26 (49%) 104.4 +1.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.