H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Harold Solomon H2H: 0-2
Harold Solomon holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Harold Solomon leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Harold Solomon won the 1976 Indianapolis second round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1976 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Harold Solomon | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1976* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Harold Solomon | 1-6 4-6 6-4 6-1 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Harold Solomon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 |