H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Ilie Nastase H2H: 2-3
Ilie Nastase holds a 3–2 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Ilie Nastase leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1982 Denver fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 80
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1982* | Denver | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kim Warwick | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1978* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kim Warwick | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Ilie Nastase | 8-6 7-5 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1974* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ilie Nastase | 6-2 6-4 (ret.) | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1974* | Hampton | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ilie Nastase | 6-1 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ilie Nastase | #1,075 | #1 | 0 | 2,260 | 859 | 331 | 72.2% | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 55 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Ilie Nastase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–14 | 74.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 60–20 | 75.0% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 73–13 | 84.9% | — | 2,079 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 106–20 | 84.1% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 118–17 | 87.4% | #1 | 2,208 | 2 | 41 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 80–21 | 79.2% | #10 | 2,153 | 2 | 48 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 91–21 | 81.2% | #7 | 2,170 | 2 | 54 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 76–17 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,179 | 2 | 59 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,092 | 2 | 62 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #16 | 2,059 | 2 | 64 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #49 | 1,795 | 2 | 64 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #77 | 1,740 | 2 | 64 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #74 | 1,730 | 2 | 64 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,633 | 2 | 64 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #118 | 1,595 | 2 | 64 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,574 | 2 | 64 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #431 | 1,535 | 2 | 64 |