H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Warwick vs John Alexander H2H: 2-1
Kim Warwick holds a 2–1 lead over John Alexander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, John Alexander won the 1982 Wimbledon first round 2-6 5-7 7-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 75
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | John Alexander | 2-6 5-7 7-6 6-3 7-5 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Dec 15, 1979* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Kim Warwick | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | John Alexander | Match data |
| Mar 30, 1978* | Milan Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kim Warwick | 6-7 7-6 6-1 | John Alexander | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| John Alexander | #860 | #8 | 0 | 2,067 | 579 | 422 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | John Alexander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 44–36 | 55.0% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 36–32 | 52.9% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #26 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 67–24 | 73.6% | #8 | 1,957 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #47 | 1,851 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 48–33 | 59.3% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 50–31 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #20 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #100 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #75 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #31 | 1,791 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #77 | 1,656 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #142 | 1,564 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,491 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |