H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Paul Kronk H2H: 1-1

Kim Warwick and Paul Kronk are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Kronk leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1978 Sydney International quarterfinal 7-5 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Paul Kronk
AUS Age 71 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #48 7-5 5-7 6-2 Paul Kronk Match data Dec 29, 1978* QF Sydney International ATP 250 Grass
Paul Kronk 6-7 6-1 7-5 Kim Warwick Match data Sep 25, 1974* R64 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Paul Kronk — — — 1,685 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Paul Kronk
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Paul Kronk
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1972 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1973 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1974 1 8 9 11.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 10 15 25 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 5 4 9 55.6% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1977 1 4 5 20.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1979 2 7 9 22.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 6 6 12 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 3 9 12 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 26 48 74 35.1% 38 71 109 34.9% 22 28 50 44.0% 6 19 25 24.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Paul Kronk
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1469 94.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.21
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1495 101.1 — — — — — — — 75.0% +1.25 — — — -0.03
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1972 1466 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.37
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1973 1512 106.7 — — — — +61 +64 -82 35.9% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 103.8 -0.01
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 1974 1501 117.5 — — — — -45 +110 — 29.7% -1.69 4–5 (44%) 5–3 (63%) 103.5 +0.16
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1975 1571 115.6 — — — — -109 +6 -89 43.0% -0.51 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) 94.5 +3.42
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1976 1536 114.9 — — — — -29 -23 -61 38.7% -1.00 0–6 (0%) 5–5 (50%) 94.9 +2.43
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.10 1977 1543 116.8 — — — — -64 -31 -37 34.4% -1.22 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 +0.96
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1978 1622 127.1 — — — — -127 -92 +21 40.0% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 106.0 +0.89
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +0.01 1979 1578 118.9 — — — — -96 -80 +59 38.1% -0.89 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 100.0 +0.14
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1980 1633 122.9 — — — — -47 -105 — 46.9% -0.45 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 104.9 +1.08
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1981 1640 118.8 — — — — -84 -155 +97 45.0% -0.36 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 101.0 +0.81
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1982 1600 102.6 — — — — — -117 — 25.0% -1.83 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.03
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 1984 1571 97.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — +0.16
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1685 121.5 — — — — -53 -33 +11 38.8% -0.90 30–41 (42%) 41–36 (53%) 103.5 +4.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.