H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 1-2
Tim Wilkison holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tim Wilkison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1983 US Open second round 6-3 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kim Warwick | 6-3 7-5 6-2 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1979* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Tim Wilkison | 6-2 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Dec 30, 1978* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Tim Wilkison | 6-3 6-3 6-7 3-6 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |