Kim Warwick
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | 4 | 5 | 9 | Dec 1, 1983 | H2H |
| Geoff Masters | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 27, 1978 | H2H |
| Sandy Mayer | 3 | 5 | 8 | Mar 14, 1981 | H2H |
| Raul Ramirez | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 29, 1978 | H2H |
| Tim Gullikson | 2 | 5 | 7 | Nov 10, 1983 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Tim Wilkison holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tim Wilkison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1983 US Open round of 64 6-3 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | 6-3 7-5 6-2 | Tim Wilkison | Match data | Sep 3, 1983* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Tim Wilkison | 6-2 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data | Jan 7, 1979* | QF | ASB Classic | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Tim Wilkison | 6-3 6-3 6-7 3-6 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data | Dec 30, 1978* | F | Sydney International | ATP 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,946 | 288 | 269 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,897 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #93 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1975 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #49 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #42 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,772 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1979 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #52 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,731 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,927 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,601 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,542 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,681 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,524 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1969 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1970 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 19 | 1971 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 20 | 1972 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% |
| 21 | 1973 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1981 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% |
| 22 | 1974 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1982 | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
| 23 | 1975 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1983 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 24 | 1976 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 1984 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1977 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1985 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1978 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1986 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 27 | 1979 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1987 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1980 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1988 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 1981 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1989 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 1982 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1990 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 1983 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1988 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 59 | 68 | 127 | 46.5% | 80 | 74 | 154 | 51.9% | 95 | 70 | 165 | 57.6% | 54 | 57 | 111 | 48.6% | — | 143 | 126 | 269 | 53.2% | 34 | 39 | 73 | 46.6% | 73 | 61 | 134 | 54.5% | 44 | 72 | 116 | 37.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1969 | 1483 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 1977 | 1567 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +28 | -30 | 44.0% | -0.32 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | +4.04 |
| 18 | 1970 | 1469 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | 43.8% | -0.16 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +1.42 | 1978 | 1660 | 119.2 | — | — | — | — | -158 | — | +58 | 42.4% | -0.46 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +1.15 |
| 19 | 1971 | 1464 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | +69 | — | +62 | 41.2% | -0.47 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.86 | 1979 | 1666 | 141.3 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -130 | +55 | 50.4% | +0.12 | 5–5 (50%) | 10–10 (50%) | — | -1.77 |
| 20 | 1972 | 1566 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +71 | 52.9% | -0.20 | 2–0 | 7–2 (78%) | — | +0.23 | 1980 | 1685 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -139 | -15 | 46.2% | -0.09 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +2.50 |
| 21 | 1973 | 1567 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -67 | -6 | +9 | 41.9% | -0.62 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.29 | 1981 | 1756 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -103 | — | +46 | 50.4% | -0.15 | 7–8 (47%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | -1.41 |
| 22 | 1974 | 1718 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -71 | 57.9% | +0.40 | 8–8 (50%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | +3.10 | 1982 | 1716 | 131.5 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -178 | +17 | 52.5% | +0.20 | 12–3 (80%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +2.66 |
| 23 | 1975 | 1740 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -122 | +35 | 53.0% | -0.02 | 8–6 (57%) | 10–3 (77%) | — | +1.45 | 1983 | 1683 | 139.3 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | -5 | 42.2% | -0.40 | 7–5 (58%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | -2.94 |
| 24 | 1976 | 1750 | 140.2 | — | — | — | — | -100 | -13 | +61 | 52.1% | +0.06 | 6–14 (30%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +0.01 | 1984 | 1767 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -95 | -134 | 54.5% | +0.71 | 8–5 (62%) | 5–11 (31%) | — | +1.11 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1714 | 136.9 | — | — | — | — | -91 | +94 | +27 | 53.7% | +0.18 | 14–4 (78%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | +1.00 | 1985 | 1807 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -169 | -99 | 56.4% | +0.46 | 9–13 (41%) | 15–9 (63%) | — | -0.48 |
| 26 | 1978 | 1790 | 148.2 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -3 | +16 | 52.6% | +0.14 | 12–6 (67%) | 12–12 (50%) | — | -1.65 | 1986 | 1773 | 145.5 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -113 | -1 | 55.6% | +0.64 | 10–5 (67%) | 12–10 (55%) | — | -0.92 |
| 27 | 1979 | 1808 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -87 | +52 | 56.5% | +0.25 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–6 (68%) | — | +3.20 | 1987 | 1731 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | +53 | 50.9% | +0.10 | 12–7 (63%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.49 |
| 28 | 1980 | 1928 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | -103 | -179 | +49 | 57.2% | +0.61 | 16–7 (70%) | 8–12 (40%) | — | -0.21 | 1988 | 1673 | 129.9 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | +13 | 44.2% | -0.22 | 3–6 (33%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +0.05 |
| 29 | 1981 | 1758 | 117.9 | — | — | — | — | -77 | — | +186 | 47.2% | +0.08 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | +1.26 | 1989 | 1602 | 130.6 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +67 | +72 | 33.9% | -0.84 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -1.68 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1786 | 145.7 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -97 | +71 | 52.1% | +0.49 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–7 (22%) | — | -1.50 | 1990 | 1542 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | -17 | +146 | +113 | 34.0% | -0.92 | 1–1 | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.59 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1681 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | — | 34.5% | -0.90 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 1690 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | +128 | 65.2% | +0.87 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 1668 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.42 | 1993 | 1525 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1655 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1947 | 139.8 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -32 | +42 | 52.5% | +0.13 | 94–71 (57%) | 86–71 (55%) | 110.5 | +1.86 | — | 1897 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -64 | +12 | 48.8% | +0.03 | 94–75 (56%) | 97–101 (49%) | 104.5 | +0.44 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | 4 | 5 | 9 | Dec 1, 1983 | H2H |
| Geoff Masters | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 27, 1978 | H2H |
| Sandy Mayer | 3 | 5 | 8 | Mar 14, 1981 | H2H |
| Raul Ramirez | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 29, 1978 | H2H |
| Tim Gullikson | 2 | 5 | 7 | Nov 10, 1983 | — |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 0 | 8 | 8 | Sep 26, 1987 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 5 | 3 | 8 | Feb 12, 1986 | H2H |
| Tim Mayotte | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jun 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Jimmy Connors | 0 | 7 | 7 | Mar 21, 1987 | H2H |
| Yannick Noah | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jan 21, 1987 | H2H |