H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Alexandr Dolgopolov H2H: 0-2
Alexandr Dolgopolov holds a 2–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Alexandr Dolgopolov won the 2016 Nottingham third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2016* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-4 7-6(5) | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 7-6(4) 6-1 6-2 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Alexandr Dolgopolov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |