H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 19:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Andreas Haider-Maurer H2H: 0-1
Andreas Haider-Maurer holds a 1–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andreas Haider-Maurer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andreas Haider-Maurer won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Andreas Haider-Maurer | 6-3 7-6(4) 6-2 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andreas Haider-Maurer | #486 | #47 | 946 | 1,749 | 39 | 74 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Andreas Haider-Maurer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #119 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #112 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #63 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |