Kyle Edmund
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | 1 | 6 | 7 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Andreas Seppi | 5 | 1 | 6 | Feb 16, 2020 | H2H |
| Denis Shapovalov | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 15, 2018 | H2H |
| John Isner | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 17, 2020 | H2H |
| Diego Schwartzman | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 31, 2019 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0
Kyle Edmund holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2016 Estoril Open first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | 6-3 7-5 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data | Apr 28, 2016* | R32 | Estoril Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Kyle Edmund | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data | Jun 25, 2012 | Q1 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,001 | 114 | 121 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,875 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2013 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2004 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 55.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2009 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 2019 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2010 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2020 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2023 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 78 | 75 | 153 | 51.0% | 24 | 27 | 51 | 47.1% | 12 | 19 | 31 | 38.7% | — | 17 | 50 | 67 | 25.4% | 76 | 102 | 178 | 42.7% | 2 | 17 | 19 | 10.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2013 | 4/4 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 64.2% | 73.6% | 51.0% | 74.3% | 14.3% | 65.6% | 31.0% | 2004 | 2/2 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 54.4% | 62.4% | 53.3% | 68.8% | 100.0% | 58.1% | 21.2% |
| 19 | 2014 | 5/5 | 5.6 | 2.8 | 61.2% | 68.8% | 43.4% | 53.2% | 11.3% | 59.5% | 28.3% | 2005 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 67.2% | 56.1% | 42.5% | 52.6% | 44.4% | 51.6% | 39.2% |
| 20 | 2015 | 5/6 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 57.8% | 62.5% | 47.8% | 52.4% | 25.3% | 56.6% | 32.3% | 2006 | 6/6 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 57.2% | 67.3% | 41.5% | 52.7% | 33.1% | 56.4% | 33.5% |
| 21 | 2016 | 36/39 | 6.2 | 2.9 | 59.3% | 71.8% | 51.0% | 57.8% | 44.0% | 63.3% | 35.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 56/56 | 5.6 | 2.9 | 58.3% | 74.7% | 54.1% | 61.2% | 42.6% | 65.9% | 37.6% | 2008 | 14/14 | 4.1 | 1.7 | 62.5% | 72.5% | 58.4% | 60.7% | 45.1% | 66.9% | 38.4% |
| 23 | 2018 | 57/58 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 59.6% | 75.7% | 54.5% | 66.1% | 40.8% | 67.3% | 37.9% | 2009 | 29/29 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 64.0% | 68.1% | 45.1% | 50.7% | 37.3% | 59.6% | 34.4% |
| 24 | 2019 | 36/36 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 62.2% | 72.0% | 52.5% | 51.4% | 42.8% | 64.7% | 34.1% | 2010 | 40/40 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 58.7% | 72.0% | 52.8% | 62.4% | 30.9% | 63.9% | 33.4% |
| 25 | 2020 | 19/19 | 5.7 | 2.7 | 61.2% | 74.4% | 50.2% | 68.7% | 36.6% | 65.0% | 38.0% | 2011 | 31/31 | 4.6 | 2.9 | 56.0% | 68.5% | 46.3% | 45.7% | 36.1% | 58.7% | 35.7% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 18/18 | 5.3 | 2.6 | 57.3% | 68.6% | 49.9% | 53.6% | 32.0% | 60.5% | 35.2% |
| 27 | 2022 | 5/5 | 7.2 | 3.4 | 53.3% | 73.2% | 39.8% | 65.6% | 63.3% | 57.5% | 33.7% | 2013 | 41/41 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 56.3% | 71.1% | 48.1% | 58.1% | 38.3% | 60.9% | 36.1% |
| 28 | 2023 | 7/7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 56.8% | 63.2% | 43.7% | 33.7% | 31.7% | 54.4% | 25.2% | 2014 | 31/31 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 56.5% | 69.9% | 50.0% | 51.7% | 45.8% | 61.3% | 36.1% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31/31 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 60.7% | 70.2% | 49.1% | 50.0% | 33.9% | 61.7% | 36.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18/18 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 56.9% | 67.3% | 44.8% | 53.3% | 43.9% | 57.6% | 36.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 81.3% | 53.8% | 33.3% | 50.0% | — | 50.0% | 20.0% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 68.3% | 61.0% | 5.3% | 53.8% | 66.7% | 43.3% | 39.1% |
| Career | — | 230/235 | 5.9 | 2.6 | 59.6% | 73.2% | 52.1% | 60.1% | 40.5% | 64.7% | 35.9% | — | 264/264 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 58.7% | 69.7% | 48.7% | 54.2% | 37.8% | 60.9% | 35.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2012 | 1500 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 1510 | 104.9 | -0.84 | -2.06 | 0.901 | 48.3% | — | — | +57 | 22.2% | -1.22 | — | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.13 | 2004 | 1482 | 101.5 | +0.02 | -4.18 | 0.507 | 41.9% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.14 |
| 19 | 2014 | 1474 | 106.7 | -2.93 | -2.24 | 0.699 | 44.8% | +38 | — | — | 8.3% | -2.50 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.07 | 2005 | 1504 | 103.3 | -2.38 | -5.10 | 0.811 | 45.3% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1587 | 116.6 | -3.20 | -1.53 | 0.745 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 1–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.23 | 2006 | 1505 | 106.3 | -1.22 | -1.03 | 0.768 | 45.4% | — | +18 | — | 28.6% | -1.21 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.11 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1883 | 152.7 | +0.52 | -0.61 | 0.956 | 49.6% | -23 | -173 | -355 | 51.6% | -0.02 | 6–6 (50%) | 12–4 (75%) | 107.3 | -0.63 | 2007 | 1519 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 1876 | 157.4 | +2.08 | +1.53 | 1.102 | 51.8% | +2 | -87 | -353 | 56.3% | +0.53 | 7–18 (28%) | 13–13 (50%) | 90.5 | -0.39 | 2008 | 1631 | 128.1 | +1.40 | -0.10 | 1.161 | 52.0% | — | +43 | — | 51.5% | +0.39 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.3 | +0.20 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1952 | 158.9 | +3.43 | +1.57 | 1.159 | 52.4% | -10 | -74 | -299 | 60.5% | +0.60 | 9–10 (47%) | 14–11 (56%) | 101.4 | -0.07 | 2009 | 1642 | 132.0 | -1.77 | -1.98 | 0.851 | 47.2% | -138 | +74 | -75 | 27.9% | -1.10 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–6 (40%) | 101.0 | -1.24 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1770 | 148.4 | +0.75 | -0.44 | 0.966 | 49.4% | +37 | +36 | -119 | 44.3% | -0.26 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–10 (9%) | 87.7 | -0.60 | 2010 | 1733 | 140.5 | +0.99 | -2.01 | 0.927 | 48.4% | -136 | +88 | — | 43.3% | -0.43 | 6–7 (46%) | 7–11 (39%) | 101.8 | -1.95 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1764 | 146.7 | +0.91 | +1.13 | 1.084 | 51.3% | +37 | — | — | 52.1% | +0.27 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–7 (30%) | 94.5 | -0.14 | 2011 | 1644 | 128.2 | -2.58 | -1.56 | 0.865 | 47.0% | -119 | +119 | -118 | 28.4% | -1.45 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.4 | -0.72 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1621 | 127.1 | -1.49 | -2.10 | 0.892 | 48.0% | -62 | +56 | — | 34.1% | -0.95 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.0 | +0.11 |
| 27 | 2022 | 1735 | 110.8 | -1.90 | +0.25 | 0.792 | 45.8% | +26 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.12 | 2013 | 1576 | 139.2 | -1.50 | -0.77 | 0.924 | 48.5% | -58 | +152 | -118 | 41.1% | -0.62 | 5–12 (29%) | 7–11 (39%) | 95.0 | +0.22 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1653 | 115.8 | -3.22 | -3.72 | 0.554 | 40.8% | +59 | +68 | — | 6.3% | -2.75 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -1.04 | 2014 | 1628 | 138.6 | -1.23 | +0.16 | 0.933 | 48.7% | -95 | +102 | -208 | 39.5% | -0.54 | 2–7 (22%) | 3–8 (27%) | 92.9 | -0.44 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1612 | 125.5 | -1.66 | -0.02 | 0.954 | 49.0% | -140 | +126 | -207 | 40.5% | -0.59 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–9 (40%) | 101.8 | +0.04 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1686 | 121.3 | -3.34 | -1.10 | 0.850 | 47.5% | — | +96 | — | 40.5% | -1.00 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.6 | +1.22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1632 | 93.9 | -2.78 | -4.11 | 0.400 | 35.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.07 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1613 | 105.0 | -4.25 | -1.02 | 0.691 | 41.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1518 | 93.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2002 | 155.4 | +1.34 | +0.47 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +7 | -64 | -227 | 50.3% | +0.06 | 28–46 (38%) | 45–55 (45%) | 88.6 | -1.17 | — | 1810 | 134.9 | -1.24 | -1.13 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -103 | +98 | -139 | 37.7% | -0.77 | 35–51 (41%) | 41–66 (38%) | 95.2 | -1.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Almagro | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 14, 2014 | H2H |
| Albert Montanes | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 8, 2016 | H2H |
| Carlos Berlocq | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 3, 2014 | H2H |
| Lukasz Kubot | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jan 1, 2014 | H2H |
| Fabio Fognini | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 19, 2016 | H2H |