H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Kyle Edmund vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 2-2

Kyle Edmund and Diego Schwartzman are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2019 Paris Masters second round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kyle Edmund #75 7-5 6-3 Diego Schwartzman #15 Match data Oct 31, 2019* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Diego Schwartzman #24 4-6 6-3 6-1 Kyle Edmund #23 Match data Apr 16, 2019* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Kyle Edmund #14 6-3 7-6(3) Diego Schwartzman #17 Match data Oct 25, 2018* R32 Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard
Diego Schwartzman #12 6-1 6-2 Kyle Edmund #16 Match data Aug 8, 2018* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kyle Edmund Diego Schwartzman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0
21 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0
22 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0
23 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1
24 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1
25 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3
27 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3
28 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kyle Edmund Diego Schwartzman
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
21 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — —
28 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's and 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kyle Edmund Diego Schwartzman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3% 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9%
21 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1% 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9%
22 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6% 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2%
23 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9% 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5%
24 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1% 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0%
25 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0% 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8%
27 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7% 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4%
28 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2% 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5%
Career — 230/235 5.9 2.6 59.6% 73.2% 52.1% 60.1% 40.5% 64.7% 35.9% — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kyle Edmund Diego Schwartzman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04
21 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.63 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40
22 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.39 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.75
23 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.07 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.35
24 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.60 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) — +0.94
25 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.14 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.44
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.19
27 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) — -1.52
28 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.93
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) — +2.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.53
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10
Career — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17 — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.