H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Ernesto Escobedo H2H: 2-0
Kyle Edmund holds a 2–0 lead over Ernesto Escobedo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2017 Brisbane third round 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2017* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Ernesto Escobedo | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 7-5 6-4 6-4 | Ernesto Escobedo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ernesto Escobedo | #1,705 | #67 | 695 | 1,765 | 20 | 39 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Ernesto Escobedo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #120 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #187 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #164 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |