H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Gilles Simon H2H: 1-2
Gilles Simon holds a 2–1 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Simon won the 2017 Lyon fourth round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2017* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Gilles Simon | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2016* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Kyle Edmund | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jun 20, 2013* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Gilles Simon | 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Gilles Simon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |