H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Kyle Edmund vs Joao Sousa H2H: 1-2

Joao Sousa holds a 2–1 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Joao Sousa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2018 Estoril Open quarterfinal 6-3 1-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Joao Sousa
POR Age 37 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joao Sousa #68 6-3 1-6 6-0 Kyle Edmund #23 Match data May 5, 2018* QF Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Joao Sousa #54 6-3 2-6 6-3 Kyle Edmund #45 Match data Aug 15, 2017* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Kyle Edmund #53 6-3 6-4 Joao Sousa #51 Match data May 16, 2017* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Joao Sousa #954 #28 1,355 1,916 190 250 43.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kyle Edmund Joao Sousa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #592 1,550 0 0
20 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #192 1,507 0 0
23 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1 2012 3–4 42.9% #101 1,587 0 0
24 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1 2013 14–13 51.9% #49 1,797 0 1
25 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2 2014 23–34 40.4% #54 1,738 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2015 34–30 53.1% #33 1,904 0 2
27 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2 2016 25–33 43.1% #43 1,805 0 2
28 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2 2017 22–30 42.3% #57 1,735 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2018 25–26 49.0% #44 1,782 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2019 25–28 47.2% #60 1,757 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2020 0–9 0.0% #90 1,607 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2021 1–13 7.1% #140 1,534 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2022 13–20 39.4% #82 1,565 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #249 1,510 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #726 1,503 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kyle Edmund Joao Sousa
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2012 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
24 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
25 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 12 18 30 40.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 18 17 35 51.4% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 12 20 32 37.5% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 10 14 24 41.7% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 15 17 32 46.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 11 12 23 47.8% 10 12 22 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% — 97 127 224 43.3% 79 98 177 44.6% 14 25 39 35.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's and 436/440 of Joao Sousa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kyle Edmund Joao Sousa
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3% 2008 2/2 3.5 1.5 58.6% 67.3% 65.4% 70.8% 31.3% 66.6% 39.5%
20 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6% 2011 2/2 3.0 1.0 60.3% 61.5% 41.4% 29.8% 58.3% 53.5% 34.6%
23 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9% 2012 7/7 2.1 3.1 59.5% 66.3% 47.7% 45.8% 29.7% 59.0% 40.6%
24 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1% 2013 27/27 2.9 2.3 61.8% 68.0% 46.5% 57.4% 38.5% 59.6% 36.1%
25 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0% 2014 56/57 2.7 2.1 60.3% 67.6% 48.1% 61.1% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 64/64 3.0 2.1 59.2% 70.2% 51.9% 61.3% 42.7% 62.8% 37.0%
27 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7% 2016 56/58 3.4 2.2 63.4% 69.2% 47.7% 50.2% 42.9% 61.2% 36.5%
28 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2% 2017 52/52 4.5 2.8 58.5% 72.3% 49.8% 56.2% 38.4% 62.7% 36.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 51/51 4.2 2.4 60.3% 72.2% 49.4% 49.3% 35.8% 63.1% 37.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/53 5.1 1.8 61.7% 70.5% 49.4% 55.1% 38.5% 62.3% 34.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 4.3 2.9 57.1% 63.3% 48.5% 51.5% 35.3% 56.6% 31.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 13/14 2.7 2.2 59.1% 63.1% 44.6% 47.1% 31.2% 54.6% 33.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 33/33 3.6 2.4 62.3% 67.9% 49.2% 54.1% 34.8% 60.9% 37.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 2.1 2.0 59.4% 62.8% 43.7% 49.1% 35.6% 55.3% 31.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.3% 64.4% 51.4% 50.0% 25.0% 58.8% 34.7%
Career — 230/235 5.9 2.6 59.6% 73.2% 52.1% 60.1% 40.5% 64.7% 35.9% — 436/440 3.6 2.2 60.6% 69.3% 48.9% 55.0% 38.5% 61.2% 36.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kyle Edmund Joao Sousa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 2008 1551 109.7 -0.19 -0.49 1.182 54.2% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.24
20 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23 2009 1550 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.63 2010 1543 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.39 2011 1507 100.3 -2.74 +2.42 0.742 44.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
23 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.07 2012 1587 111.9 -2.10 -0.18 0.991 49.4% — +54 — 41.2% -0.77 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.38
24 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.60 2013 1797 138.5 -2.50 -0.67 0.896 48.2% -3 -191 — 47.9% -0.34 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.54
25 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.14 2014 1738 146.5 -2.75 -1.03 0.869 47.5% +1 -106 -36 39.7% -0.87 12–10 (55%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.16
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1904 152.2 -1.01 +1.38 0.995 49.9% -46 -72 -203 50.0% 0.00 15–9 (63%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.31
27 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12 2016 1806 151.2 -1.66 +0.21 0.941 48.8% +1 +17 -112 44.7% -0.45 9–13 (41%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.35
28 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04 2017 1736 145.9 -0.81 -0.18 0.979 49.7% +18 +58 -117 46.3% -0.23 7–14 (33%) 8–12 (40%) — +2.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1783 147.5 -0.33 +1.07 1.015 50.0% +38 -32 -147 46.7% -0.07 14–11 (56%) 12–10 (55%) — +1.17
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1758 141.2 -1.27 -1.02 0.916 48.4% +5 -7 -4 45.8% -0.41 13–10 (57%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 110.6 -2.88 -2.72 0.729 44.1% +41 +32 — 8.7% -2.35 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.04
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1534 111.8 -5.26 -2.49 0.736 44.3% +92 +15 — 17.1% -2.14 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.37
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1565 131.7 -1.95 -0.02 0.952 48.8% +14 +70 +27 40.2% -0.41 6–6 (50%) 6–12 (33%) — +0.40
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1510 117.4 -3.91 -3.09 0.700 43.9% — +62 — 32.0% -1.80 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.20
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1504 100.9 +0.27 +1.28 0.840 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10
Career — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17 — 1917 144.3 -1.66 -0.16 0.928 48.6% +4 -9 -83 43.2% -0.48 86–82 (51%) 77–93 (45%) 99.0 +1.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.