H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 0-1
Tobias Kamke holds a 1–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2014 Marseille third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2014* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tobias Kamke | 7-5 6-1 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |