H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lars Burgsmuller vs Francisco Roig H2H: 0-1
Francisco Roig holds a 1–0 lead over Lars Burgsmuller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Roig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Roig won the 1996 Barcelona second round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 50
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1996* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Francisco Roig | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Lars Burgsmuller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lars Burgsmuller | #1,129 | #65 | 596 | 1,747 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lars Burgsmuller | Francisco Roig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #134 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #134 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #83 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #141 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |