H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Laslo Djere vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-2
Dominic Thiem holds a 2–1 lead over Laslo Djere in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2023 Kitzbuhel semifinal 6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2023* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(8) | Laslo Djere | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2022* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2019* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-3 6-3 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laslo Djere | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |